
Berkeley, CA, October 22, 2008 -- On October 18, 2008, an OpEdNews article titled, "8 House Members View Draft Bill on Independent Science/Tech Probe of WTC 1, 2, 7 Collapses," was published by four members of the group Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice (STJ911.org). The authors of the article and draft bill are not spokespersons for Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice, and therefore are individually responsible for it.
Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice does not endorse the draft bill due to the inclusion of numerous unscientific claims and misrepresentations, and condemns in the strongest of terms any associations between the organization and the claims presented by the authors of this bill. As stated at the front page of their website, Scholars for 9-11 Truth and Justice "take[s] care to present the strongest, most credible research available..."
This is an astounding piece of information. If the "man-in-the-street" passes on wrong information it will be because he has been misled, but if a person who professes an interest in 9/11, and is an activist, does so it will be because he is a disinfo expert.
The 9/11 truth movement has been plagued by disinfo. Some must be being produced by paid scumbags. Some is is passed on by innocent misled people, but regardless of where it comes from it does damage. The moment I read that this bill seeks to have more regulation of building construction to avoid a repetion I knew this was disinfo. How can there be a need to change building design to have it resist destruction by explosives?
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |