Visit LooseNuke's column >>

LOOSENUKEHome Page

Human being, concerned Citizen, Truth & Justice activistd
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 1; Links Seeded: 81
Member Since: 5/2006Last Seen: 11/03/2009

Scholars for 9-11 Truth & Justice Misrepresented in Draft Bill Sent to 8 House Members

advertisement

Berkeley, CA, October 22, 2008 -- On October 18, 2008, an OpEdNews article titled, "8 House Members View Draft Bill on Independent Science/Tech Probe of WTC 1, 2, 7 Collapses," was published by four members of the group Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice (STJ911.org). The authors of the article and draft bill are not spokespersons for Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice, and therefore are individually responsible for it.

Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice does not endorse the draft bill due to the inclusion of numerous unscientific claims and misrepresentations, and condemns in the strongest of terms any associations between the organization and the claims presented by the authors of this bill. As stated at the front page of their website, Scholars for 9-11 Truth and Justice "take[s] care to present the strongest, most credible research available..."

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
0.5
{"commentId":3667185,"authorDomain":"gravity32"}

This is an astounding piece of information. If the "man-in-the-street" passes on wrong information it will be because he has been misled, but if a person who professes an interest in 9/11, and is an activist, does so it will be because he is a disinfo expert.

The 9/11 truth movement has been plagued by disinfo. Some must be being produced by paid scumbags. Some is is passed on by innocent misled people, but regardless of where it comes from it does damage. The moment I read that this bill seeks to have more regulation of building construction to avoid a repetion I knew this was disinfo. How can there be a need to change building design to have it resist destruction by explosives?

{"commentId":3667185,"threadId":"398005","contentId":"2032963","authorDomain":"gravity32"}
    Reply#1 - Fri Oct 24, 2008 3:39 AM EDT
    {"canLink":false,"threadId":"398005","isPrivate":false}
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    {"threadId":"398005","contentId":"2032963"}
    Start TrackingStart Tracking
    Stop TrackingStop Tracking